The world is buying art

Andy-warhol-coca-cola-006

It's the height of auction season, and the art market internationally seems to be doing really well. 

It's true that lots have things have changed over the last two years and the Guardian article below highlights some of the key dynamics - in particular, the growing interest and buying power of the Middle East, Russia and China. 

However, in some European countries the art market is also very strong. In France, FIAC has bounced back to nearly overtake Frieze in its importance as a contemporary art fair. French buyers who weren't bothered to take the train over to London are finding themselves more easily in contact with cutting edge contemporary art from around the world, while the long tradition of collecting in France means that they are also less interested in speculative purchases (a considerable factor in why London shot to prominence in the art market in recent years, but something which has dramatically tapered off since 2008).

In France, it's very common for a lawyer or business professional in their 30s to spend a considerable portion of their wealth on buying art. Such a thing is practically unimaginable in Ireland. Strangely, this doesn't really have anything to do with disposible income (in these tighter times in Ireland, it's of course less likely). It's more due to a different tradition, outlook, and conception of value. 

More importantly though, in France, and Paris especially, there is incredible exposure to an immense diversity of art and culture. From mega blockbuster exhibitions (Monet at the Grand Palais at the moment), to serious historical thematic shows (the 2009 Surrealism show at the Pompidou), to an absolute plethora of contemporary art galleries who are increasingly having a presence internationally, but who are all deeply connected to a multi-disciplinary creative community that is closely linked to technology (iPhones, web, etc), but also France's economic and cultural expansion - especially into the Middle East and Asia, with the Louvre and Pompidou being the two biggest museum exports/franchises.

In Ireland, in the midst of so much gloom, and worries about new property taxes, etc, there's a huge amount to be gained from just reading this Guardian article. You can't help but feel there's a BIG world out there. And there's a big market out there - deep pockets, but also deep confidence, deep risk taking, deep passion. 

No matter how rich you are, it takes passion to spend US$35m on a single Warhol (pictured at top of post) - a beautiful image, but certainly not one of the more flash, recognizable or iconic Warhols.  

It takes a passion and creative perspective to spend such massive sums on art. The article refers to how art is a luxury product, and it's very true. But it's a very different kind of luxury. Financially, it's a luxury that generally will always go up in value. Culturally, it's an investment into a shared history, into an artistic narrative that will continue into the future. Only a few will remember the ins-and-outs of a particular company's achievements over the years, but coming into contact with incredible works of art on the walls brings a whole other dimension - to the company, or to the executive who works there. 

Few people in Ireland are now in the league to be making art acquisitions of this scale (€200k+). Yet even during the boom, people who had big money didn't really dip their toes. But while there's less money around in all our pockets, it doesn't mean there aren't ways to spend €300 and be part of the same process of discovery, learning and collecting. Certainly from the research Fiona and myself are doing, there are exceptional artworks to be acquired at the moment at very reasonable prices, that will make extraordinary good investments. And works that won't be so easily accessible in a few years time. 

This Guardian article is a really positive reminder that even amid economic crisis, art and culture lives on. Art is a powerful force.

_49890108_010394240-1

This picture by Lichtenstein (above) sold for US$42.6m yesterday at Christies in New York. An impressive three times the previous record for Lichtenstein only five years ago in 2005 (US$16.2m).

"Oh... Alright..."

It's the perfect work and outlook for the times we're in. The concerned look, the worry, the reflection. But the need to move on and progress. To communicate with the outside world, to look and work towards the bigger picture.

This work for me has gained massively in meaning since being bought yesterday. There's now so much extra going on with the image. Looking at it now, I don't see the 1960s and Pop Art. I see 2010, heading into 2011. 

If I was rich, I would love to have this on my wall now. It's oozes optimism, despite the worried look on her face. Sure, things are bleak. But let's just keep on trucking.

It might sound crazy right now. But that $42million is also a very shrewd investment. I'm guessing it will be double or more in 5-6 years. 

The curious power of art. 

Art auction records broken by new breed of billionaires

Up to £1bn will be spent on expressionist and contemporary works in New York this week if sales reach expectations
167
  • Nu-assis-sur-un-divan-by--006
    Modigliani's painting, Nu Assis sur un Divan was recently sold at auction for $68.9m (£42.7m). Photograph: Emmanuel Dunand/AFP/Getty Images

    By the end of this week, New York will have come to the end of a fortnight of impressionist and contemporary art sales at its main auction houses. Already, the auction record for a Modigliani has been broken. By Thursday, if the sales reach expectations, £1bn will have been spent.

    For ordinary mortals – those dealing with the bleak everyday challenges of recession on both sides of the Atlantic – the prices are staggering. How come, when our own economy is struggling through the deepest downturn since the second world war, the art market seems to have wriggled out of the crash of 2008 and auction houses are mounting what one expert calls "ambitious, pumping, thrusting" sales?

    After last week's impressionist sales, it is the turn of contemporary art to go under the hammer. At Christie's, Campbell's Soup Can With Can Opener by Andy Warhol is among the star turns, estimated at $30-50m (£18m-£30m). Sotheby's has a Coca-Cola bottle canvas by him at $20-25m.

    The answer, or part of it, is that the very top of the art market is semi-detached from the movements of individual economies. Rather, it is bound up with the tastes and choices of a number of super-rich people in Europe and America – and, increasingly, Russia, China and the Middle East. As Brett Gorvy, deputy chairman of Christie's, put it: "The market is not reliant on one single economy at any one time."

    In pockets, at least, the very rich are spending on luxuries – a category into which contemporary art arguably falls – without apparent restraint. In Hong Kong this month, Sotheby's held an auction of fine wine that saw an Asian buyer purchase three bottles of 1869 Château Lafite for $232,000 each, a new record. Even more surprisingly, cases of wine that retail for $17,000 in New York were selling at the auction for $70,000.

    Meanwhile, the tastes of Chinese, Russian and Middle Eastern billionaires are increasingly embracing contemporary art. One of the stars of tomorrow's Christie's sale – estimated at $40m, over double its previous saleroom record of $16.3m – is a Roy Lichtenstein titled Ohhh ... Alright ...

    The painting shows a beautiful red-headed woman, telephone receiver cradled to her cheek, thought-bubble drifting from her temple.

    "It's not too racy," said Sarah Thornton, art market expert and author of Seven Days in the Art World. "So it could easily go the Middle East. And it's totally palatable to the Asian and Russian markets, where figurative work is preferred. It seems the taste for pretty girls is fairly universal."

    This month blue chip London galleries, such as White Cube and Timothy Taylor, travelled to the Abu Dhabi art fair to sell to their growing numbers of Middle Eastern clients. Abu Dhabi's rising appetite for western art of all kinds is evidenced by the development of Saadiyat Island, a new cultural district in which branches of the Louvre and Guggenheim museums are planned to open by 2014.

    Thornton has noticed a trend among the emerging super-rich. "They tend to start by collecting art of their own nations, whether Middle Eastern, Russian or Chinese. But – perhaps as their own businesses become global businesses – their predilections shift towards contemporary art."

    Having the "right" contemporary art is a totem of a certain kind of lifestyle, a badge of elite wealth. Gorvy says the numbers of collectors from Hong Kong, Taiwan and China "increased dramatically" over the past two years.

    It was partly because of its international nature, spanning many economies at once, that the art market recovered from its big dip of late 2008 (in the wake of the collapse of Lehmann Brothers) faster than most had expected. "It took six months, and people expected it to be four to five years," said Gorvy.

    The speed of recovery itself breeds confidence, so that sellers who had been anxious to consign works of art to the saleroom two years ago are now returning to the market. There is, nonetheless, a different feel to the auction rooms than there was mid-decade.

    Speculation on new names is down; tried and tested artists with impeccable records are on the up.

    Amanda Sharp is cofounder of Frieze art fair, London's most important annual selling event for contemporary art, and a barometer of the market as a whole.

    Though last month's fair was "in the main good", the market was certainly "much slower than the extreme times of 2006".

    She added: "In 2008 there was fear in the air. Last year, you felt galleries had made tough decisions, rolled up their sleeves and carried on. This year it felt like the panic had gone. There was a post-bling feel to it, and most galleries were showing considered and restrained displays."

    There also practical reasons for buying art. At a time of economic uncertainty, art is a hedge against currency fluctuation. "If you buy a property in Mayfair, you will always have to sell it in pounds," said Thornton. "If you buy art, its value will be in whatever denomination you choose, depending on where you choose to put it on the block."

    Arguably, the art market has something in common with the gold market, which is bouncing at the moment, with prices topping $1,400 an ounce last week. Art, like gold, is tangible – not a stock or a share, or complex derivative that cannot be physically embodied.

    "I spoke to a gentleman the other day," said Gorvy. "He bought a painting for $5m in 2008 and it's now worth $6m. Whereas many of his shares are worth nothing at all."

    Pop art
    Like gold, a very instant message

    According to Brett Gorvy, deputy chairman of Christie's, the top of the contemporary art market is "conservative" and "focused on quality". He explained: "There is no difference from the move to buying gold, in a way: people are being drawn to things whose value is tried and tested."

    Whereas the boom up to 2006 and 2007 saw speculation on new names, buyers are now attracted to 20th-century art history.

    "Pop is the overriding movement at the moment," said Gorvy. "Warhol is huge, and Lichtenstein is globally popular."

    The star of Christie's New York sale is a Roy Lichtenstein canvas. The star at Sotheby's is a Coca-Cola bottle by Andy Warhol with an estimate of $20m-$25m.

    Part of the point is that pop art can transcend cultural boundaries and appeal to an international audience; the art embodies clear, simple messages. "It is very instant in terms of understanding," said Gorvy.

    Jeff Koons, whose Balloon Flower (Blue), pictured left, will be one of the Christie's evening sale highlights with an estimate of $12m-$16m, is a popular, blue-chip name, as is Richard Prince. So is Gerhard Richter, one of whose candle paintings, Zwei Kerzen (1982) is to come under the hammer this week also estimated at $12m-$16m.

    Mark Rothko makes appearances at both Sotheby's and Christie's this week, with his yellow and white 1955 painting Untitled estimated at $20m-$30m at Sotheby's.

    • This article was amended on 10 November 2010. The original referred to the current price of gold as $14,000 an ounce. This has been corrected.

    (download)

    Le Monde Review of Muybridge Tate show

    Logolemonde

    Published today, Le Monde have a short piece on the Muybridge exhibition at Tate Britain. French article here and Google translation.


    P46731-12477_4

    It's a succint bio of Muybridge and his career, but surprisingly pooly written and doesn't really talk about the works themselves, or Muybridge's extraordinary influence on our visual lives.

    Anyhow, most bizarrely, the articles says he was Irish. Afraid not, although he did lecture here (Dublin and Belfast) a number of times, mainly in 1890. See Stephen Herbert's astoundingly detailed Muybridge chronology

    Wonderful Doisneau show in Milan

    Img

    Fantastic Doisneau show on at Forma Fondation for Photography in Milan. Would really love to see his Palm Springs photos from 1960 - Doisneau in COLOUR. Never saw these before. They look fantastic!

    Robert-doisneau-palm-springs-1

    The Palm Springs photos were first exhibited in Paris last June. Interesting background to Doisneau's trip and shoot can be read on this blog post.

    210510180524doisneauuuu

    This next image is stunning:

    210510180504doisneauuu


    A few more pics can be seen in this otherwise dull video Forma made:

    Michael Stipe of REM - The Future of Photography, inspired by Muybridge

    Muybridge is everywhere at the moment. 

    Coolhunting.com posted a few days ago a really interesting article on a new project by the lead singer of REM, Michael Stipe, who has recently turned his hands to artistic and photographic projects.

    When you read about the workshop, it's really exciting to see how Muybridge was the inspiration behind this new visual project by Stipe in New York, using the latest imaging technology to do something new and fresh. It's exactly these ideas we like to promote and encourage at Mondrian's Room - how the apparently "old" stuff can inspire incredibly new creative ideas and stimulate new thinking, and even new business opportunities.

    And Stipe is completely right when he says: "I think that 10 or 12 years from now that is going to radically alter the way we think about what a still image is." We're at a radically new juncture in the history of the image. There's lots going on and lots about to change, and it's hard to fully get a handle on it. One of the future big projects of Mondrian's Room (anticipated to launch in March/April 2011) is going to hopefully contribute to this. More on this very soon...

    Meantime, back in July when we held a series of talks to coincide with our "Motion Colour" exhibition, we had fantastic exchanges about how Muybridge's work - as one example - has already and will continue to spark new creative practices, and how new creativity and cultural innovation is something essential to drive the future Irish economy. It's a key motivator for us at Mondrian's Room - to only pick artworks that will inspire about the past, but in doing so also ignite fresh ideas about the future. You'd be surprised how even a cheap photo from 1910 can make your jaw drop with not only "Wow, that's so cool, what a brilliant idea and look". WIth the recent interest in upcycling furniture and art, we also think there's so much potential in upcycling and repurposing the ideas behind our cultural past.

    For those of you who didn't get to see our July talks, the third and final talk will be uploaded tomorrow. The links will be posted here.

    So for those of you who like Michael Stipe and REM, but may have never heard of Muybridge or early motion photography, or aren't particularly bothered about art, then maybe this is a chance to dip your toes. Let us know what you think!

    An Interview with Michael Stipe

    We sit down with R.E.M.'s frontman to learn about his latest creative initiative

    by Ami Kealoha in Culture on 25 October 2010 
    Michael-stipe1-thumb-949x806-2


    When we found out that Michael Stipe was visiting Levi's photo workshop in NYC to conduct a project of his own last Friday, we of course headed down to learn more. There within the tall white walls of the former gallery, dozens of young creative types lined up, all anxiously awaiting their brush with one of American music's greats. As participants full of awe and admiration reached the front of the line, 7-inches and 'zines piled up next to Stipe, who quietly greeted each person, explaining how they would take the next photo before sitting for the following one. After the last subject shuffled through, we sat down with the man whose career spans musician, filmmaker and artist to learn more about what brought him there, his thoughts on brand collaborations and karaoke.

    Michael-stipe3-1-thumb-645x833




    What inspired you about the space initially?

    It's got a great provenance in that most New Yorkers know it as Deitch Projects, so some of the creative stuff that's happened in this particular space is pretty legendary and this is a pretty awesome follow-up. It's a very different thing, but I like the openness of it. I guess Levi's is paying for it, but I think it's really cool—whoever had the idea to do it.

     
    Michael-stipe6-1-thumb-843x833
    For our generation, working with brands was really problematic, no one wanted to be a sellout. But more and more that seems to be just what's happening, do you still have a choice?

    I think you do have a choice and my band R.E.M. for instance, have never accepted any endorsement for any purpose that was not artistic. So the line that we draw is a fine line, but anything that is an artform or anything that is artistic or creative, like a film or TV show or some collaboration that makes sense, we're okay with lending or allowing our music to be used, or our name to be used for something like that as opposed to having a tour sponsored by a brand.

    Obviously, this is somewhere in that gray area and that's part of what makes it a little bit interesting. It's responding to the needs of the market in the 21st century, but it happens to be a very cool company that's doing it and it seems fairly no-strings-attached. So I'm happy to participate.

    How did the space lead to what you're doing here?

    This thing? This very simply is a response to a moment in time. In 2010 we find ourselves in—it's not a DMZ, it's not a no man's land—it's like a middle space between what is still photography and what is a moving image. Technology has advanced to the point now that the most recent professional cameras actually don't take still images as much they take short films and then you find the frame that you want to be a still image.

    I think that 10 or 12 years from now that is going to radically alter the way we think about what a still image is. And so what we did today is something that goes back to the very beginning of moving imagery with Eadweard Muybridge of course. It takes this very simple idea of a still image and animates it simply. In our case, we're putting it through a Mac and doing a repetitive action that's easy to understand.

    Michael-stipe9

    How did you choose the subjects?

    I just wanted it to feel really democratic, kind of like the space. And I didn't want to do anything myself, I didn't really want to own it. I'm happy to own the idea or to have participated in the idea, but I didn't feel the need to take a picture or be one of the participants in the piece itself.

    I like how in a way it's a little bit like a self-portrait daisy chain. I think that term has good and then very sexual connotations, it doesn't have to have sexual connotations! If there's a bad connotation, please strike that remark. Your image is being taken quite democratically by the next person in line, who takes the next person in line.

    As an artist I'm thinking about and dealing right now in sculpture with the bust in history. I'm not certain that there's a 21st-century response to what a bust is as a sculptural thing.

    Michael-stipe8-thumb-886x633-2
    What is the historical significance of the bust that inspires you?

    Before photography and moving film there were more limited ways in which to capture someone's likeness. In the case of world leaders, death masks were made—or life masks, in the case of William Blake. I've seen a copy that Patti Smith took and made into her version of a 21st-century bust.

    This would be in a way, research for me on my version of a 21st-century bust. I'm actually coming away from this with this feeding the other work I'm doing outside of music. This is an idea at the moment. The only sculptures that people know of mine are actually quite limited. There are no busts, that'll come this year.

    Why bust as opposed to a portrait?

    It allows me to be able to see—if I'm looking at someone—maybe they've got a great personality, but I'm looking at them and going, is this someone who from three dimensions would create an amazing piece that would speak beyond me or beyond my desires as an artist, but might provide comment or commentary or inspire other people who have no idea who this person was. So it's taking something that's quite subjective and trying to, in a very positive way, objectify it.

    Michael-stipe2-thumb-1000x687-

    Do you mind telling us about your tattoo?

    This was one I had done in the early '90s, it was maybe 1993 or '94. Now it's a part of me, I don't remember the original intent. I don't think it matters.

    What's your favorite song for karaoke?

    Oh, good one. 'Justify My Love' by Madonna. It's so retarded, it's spoken word so you can really have fun with it if you've had a few beers too many, and people respond to it well. The easy thing for me is Jimmy Webb songs, Glenn Campbell songs that he wrote because I can actually hit the notes...unless they pitch it higher or lower than my particular range.

    Photos by Karen Day

    Mondrian's Room Talks - Saturday 3rd July @ 3pm

    MONDRIAN’S ROOM TALKS

     

    THE BIRTH OF MOTION AND COLOUR PHOTOGRAPHY

     

    What can we still learn from the inventions of Muybridge and the Lumière brothers?

     

    Bobby Kerr

    Investor on Dragon's Den and Chairman of Insomnia

    Patronage and the Arts

     

    Steve Woods

    Animator and Lecturer at Dun Laoghaire College of Art, Design and Technology

    A brief history of our quest to capture motion, from cave paintings to the present

     

    Dr. Anil Kokaram

    Assistant Professor, Electrical Engineering, Trinity College Dublin

    The Matrix and Beyond - The legacy of Muybridge on recent Hollywood films and visual effects

     

    Fiona Bailey and Aebhric Coleman

    Directors of Mondrian's Room

    How Colour Photography changed our world

     

    Saturday 3rd July @ 3pm

     

    MONDRIAN’S ROOM 

    @ 15 ST STEPHENS GREEN, DUBLIN 2

     

    We would be delighted if you could join us.

     

    Please RSVP to info@mondriansroom.com before Thursday, 6pm. 

    Space limited to 50 people.

     

     

    EXHIBITION HOURS 

    1st - 11th JULY 2010 10am - 6pm

     

    www.mondriansroom.com

    Muybridge influence on Cy Tyombly

    98-009dj_hires_000

    Chatting to Andrew in Watsham and Bohn in Monkstown yesterday, I learned that a large work by Cy Twombly was directly influenced by Muybridge's motion photographs. 

    The work, entitled, Treatise on the Veil (Second Version), was painted in Rome in 1970 and is fascinating. It is 35 feet long, super minimal yet very dynamic, and rich in references. The work forms part of the great Menil Collection in Houston, Texas and was included in a big Tyombly retrospective at the Tate Modern in 2008, which is where Andrew saw it. The canvas was recently exhibited at Menil with related drawings from the artist's collection. 

    Here is information concerning the Muybridge connection, taken from an interesting article written by Jeffrey Weiss at the time of the Tate exhibition.

    [...] The spareness of the Veil paintings is startling 

    . The artist has said that they were motivated by a motion-study photograph by Eadweard Muybridge that belonged to Rauschenberg, showing a walking woman vaguely recalled by Twombly as bearing a drape or a bride's veil. Composed of ruled lines (which describe a repeated plinth form) and numerals, the paintings purport to diagram a trajectory of motion from left to right. They are both exceptionally large (the second version is more than thirty feet long); for this reason, they can be said to derive a kind of functionality from the calibrated backdrops (in actuality a wall or screen) in Muybridge's photographs, which typically show a white grid against a dark ground with a numerical sequence running along the bottom edge: By conceit, at least, the paintings measure the beholder's own progress through real as well as imagined space, the numerals in the paintings being variously annotated as inches, feet, and miles. Twombly produced numerous smaller works that incorporate elements from the two Veil paintings, although, again, only a handful of these appear in the show. A third, directly related white-ground painting, The Veil of Orpheus, 1968 (which stimulated its own smaller variants and derivations), has also been excluded. Yet, with its three long, shaky, freehand  lines (also annotated with numbers and words-STOP, NON-STOP, TIME), it is a crucial work in this context. Twombly's Orpheus (imported from Rilke's sonnets) primarily figures movements of rising and falling, in reference both to the arc of song and to Orpheus's sojourn through the underworld. But the artist has also explained that the long lines in The Veil of Orpheus specifically allude to a musique concrete work of the same name by Pierre Henry from 1953, which consists of the continual sound of tearing fabric (possibly with reference to a veiled Eurydice). [...]

    Mondrian's Room in Irish Times

    Irish_times_photoireland_revie

    It's the weekend! And The Irish Times have a special extended coverage of the 1st PhotoIreland Festival - well done Angel!

    Great to see photography (finally) getting some decent coverage. The Festival has a great line up of shows and it's the perfect time of the year. Fiona and I are looking forward to seeing everything around town.

    Over the next days, we will blog lots more with suggestions and thoughts about what we feel are interesting things to know about the works in our exhibition. And when the show opens, we'll let you know what visitors are saying, and information we're learning from all of you. For us, this is the most exciting part. Talking with you, hearing your reactions, and seeing in what ways the works capture your imagination. If and when you visit, you'll see that we love to chat lots about the works we have on show - also because this is the way we ourselves learn the most. 

    If you read the Irish Times article, two things are perhaps good to clarify. Firstly, Muybridge's photos aren't technically time-lapse - they're in fact the opposite. Muybridge's innovation was taking pictures extremely quickly - nowadays we call this more "stop motion" or "motion capture". Also, in 1872 Muybridge became an international celebrity because the photographs he took for Leland Stanford of a running horse in fact proved that horses DO run with all feet off the ground at certain points. See this page on our website for some more info and pictures.

    UDPATE: The description of the autochrome as a "painterly technique for making colour photographs" is also technically not really right. The autochrome was a fully mechanical process, so was revolutionary because it was truly the first colour photography. Prior to then, the only way to achieve colour in photography was via more painterly methods, such as painting B&W images, or combining three different coloured images together. However, autochromes were 100% mechanical, even if up-close the starch grains did give a visual effect similar to Pointillist paintings.

    Major website update!

    Pastedgraphic-1

    This morning, we've updated our website with a significant new amount of content on Muybridge and the Lumière brothers.

    It's in preparation for our exhibition "Motion Colour: The Birth of Motion and Colour Photography", which opens next Thursday 1st July at 10am, as part of PhotoIreland 2010.

    On the website, you'll now find lots of new information, images and videos, together with links to interesting articles and websites.

    Let us know what you think! 

    If you've suggestions of other content that you think could be included, or that you'd like to see there, please drop us an email and tell us. Or if you spot any glitches or typos we'd also love to hear from you.

    Inventor of Digital Camera

    With our exhibition opening next week featuring early colour photographs taken by the inventors of colour photography, the Lumière brothers, it's really interesting to see this video with the inventor of the digital camera, Steven Sasson.

    Fascinating also that Kodak didn't speak publically about its experiments and work in digital photography for 26 years!! Extraordinary, and probably also why the company nearly went bust. They didn't see where things were moving.

    Thanks to Alan at Photographers.ie for tweeting this video.

    </object>